ASME B31G (Revision of ASME B31G). Manual for. Determining the. Remaining Strength of. Corroded Pipelines Supplement to ASME B31 Code for. 2 Feb Integration with NDT tools. ▫ 3D surface measurements. ▫ UT. ▫ What’s next? ▫ Pit gage data entry interface. ▫ ASME B31G (), DNV RP-F Remaining Strength of Corroded Pipelines. Houston Section. April 10, 4. Introduction. • Pipeline Design. • ASME B31G. • Limits for B31G. • Misc.
|Published (Last):||7 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||2.57 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.58 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Locate the table corresponding to the size of the pipe, D.
ASME procedures provide for reconsideration of any interpretation when or if additional information that might affect an interpretation is available. A failure criterion should be developed that considers the strain capacity or fracture resistance characteristics of the material.
High longitudinal stresses in tension acting on metal loss having a significant circumferential extent, in unrestrained piping, could change the failure asme b31g 2012 from asme b31g 2012 to circumferential.
Consideration should be given to minimum thresholds of metal loss for reliable detection and sizing, minimum thresholds for reporting, and the expected mode of coating failure e. It requires for input asme b31g 2012 detailed longitudinal distribution or profile of metal loss.
The B31G document provided pipeline operators with a simplified evaluation method based on the results of analysis and tests. Interacting flaws should be evaluated as a single flaw combined from all interacting flaws.
Asme b31g download
Mauro, American Electric Power J. The Committee welcomes proposals for revisions to this Standard. We need your help! Silvia, Process Engineers and Constructors, Inc.
L, Contract PRDec. Determine applicable pipe material properties from appropriate records. Correspondence With the B31 Committee. All methods described herein have been demonstrated to provide reliable and conservative results when they are applied correctly and within stated limitations. Coym, Aasme Moody C. If the exact measured value is not listed, choose the row showing the next greater depth. ASME procedures provide for reconsideration of these interpretations when or if additional information is available which the inquirer believes might affect the interpretation.
The tables are carried over without change asme b31g 2012 previous editions of B31G and have been supplemented by the addition of asme b31g 2012 in metric units.
It is intended that a Level 3 evaluation be conducted by a asme b31g 2012 specialist having appropriate expertise in the subject of fitness-for-service assessment. They asmme calculated from h31g equations for a Level 1 evaluation in accordance with the original B31G methodology.
A majority of these other methods are based on the same theoretical model from which the original B31G method was derived, but may offer some refinement in accuracy. There is an option available to automatically receive an e-mail notification when errata are posted to a particular code or asme b31g 2012.
Larger factors of safety may be appropriate asme b31g 2012 some cases, e. Revisions are made periodically to the Standard to incorporate changes that appear necessary or desirable, as demonstrated by the experience gained from the application of the Standard. Please help us to share our service with your friends.
Requests for Cases should also indicate the applicable edition s of the standard to which the proposed Case applies. Our representatives are ready to assist you in the following areas: It is intended that a Level 0 evaluation be conducted in the field without the need for asme b31g 2012 detailed calculations. Additional procedures for inquiries may be listed within.
Where the term pipeline is used, it may also be read to apply to piping or aasme conforming to the acceptable applications and within the technical limitations discussed below. The following guideline is suggested with asme b31g 2012 to Fig.
Select an evaluation method and calculate the estimated failure stress, SF. Care should be taken when cleaning corroded areas of a pressurized pipe. It shall be evaluated for safe operating pressure as with corrosion having a helical angle greater g31g 45 deg to the pipe axis. Soni, Delegate, Engineers India Ltd. If the helical pattern lies at an angle of 45 deg or greater to the pipe axis, it is sufficient to consider the most severe longitudinal section through the corroded area having a length L2 in Fig.
This can increase the reassessment interval to the next inline inspection. The user should consider referring to applicable sources as necessary in order to best implement a given method. Asme b31g 2012 references may be found in other documents available in the public domain. The methods and criteria provided herein do not address circumferential failure due asme b31g 2012 high longitudinal tensile stresses.
Corrosion may occur such that multiple areas of metal loss are asme b31g 2012 spaced longitudinally or transversely. October 24, The next edition of this Manual is scheduled for publication in B31J Pipeline Personnel Qualification. Axme given below are identified on the pages by a margin note, 12placed next to the affected area.
Tatar, FM Global K.
The B31 Standards Committee regularly holds meetings, which are open to asme b31g 2012 public. For a corroded profile defined by n measurements of depth of corrosion including the end points at nominally full wall thickness, n! These replies are taken verbatim from the original letters, except for a few typographical and editorial corrections made for the purpose of improved clarity.
It is intended that a Level 1 evaluation be conducted in the field by an engineer, corrosion technician, coating inspector, or other individual having asme b31g 2012 training. Payne, Alstom Power, Inc. When calculating the hoop stress SO or Shis t in this case the corroded pipe wall thickness?
Bodenhamer, Enterprise Products Co.
Similar issues should be considered in developing a suitable safety factor as aasme described for a Asme b31g 2012 1 or Level 2 analysis. Users of a code or standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, is entirely their own responsibility.