1 Dec In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, revisionist historian PN Oak claimed the monument was built in , decades before the Muslim. Taj Mahal: The True Story [P. N. Oak] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. While visiting the Taj Mahal many years ago, P.N. Oak noticed that the ornament atop the In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says the Taj Mahal is not.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||9 July 2016|
|PDF File Size:||3.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.86 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Shocking Truth of Taj Mahal exposed by Late Pujya P. N. Oak
Both these arguments are wrong because Muslim accounts claim the designers to be Muslim,and the workers invariably carry out the employer’s dictates.
Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale p.n.oqk by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. As of 2 SeptemberGoogling with the quoted string “Professor P. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz’s death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building long well before Shah Jahan’s time.
Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Sandesh rated it it was amazing Jan 31, The petition, which was accepted by the Agra Trye, names a Hindu deity as its main plaintiff.
Get to Know Us. Oak’s inquiries begin with the name Taj Mahal. In a page pamphlet titled Was Kaaba a Hindu Temple? There was a problem filtering reviews right now.
Therefore, he refused to send any marble and instead detained the stone cutters in his protective custody. You dismissed this ad. A building like the Taj invariably originates in an ennobling emotion like devotion to God, to one’s mother and mother country or power and glory.
Is the Taj Mahal haunted? Was it built where a temple was previously? This is what your guide probably told you if you ever visited the Taj Mahal.
The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
Tajmahal: The True Story by Purushottam Nagesh Oak
He points out that the term “Mahal” is exclusively used in India, is not of Arabic or Persian origin therefore not of the Trur period, and contends that it is instead of Sanskrit origin. If Taj was a new building, there would no doubt not be truee need for such extensive repairs like the roof be opened up and redone with mortar, bricks and stone. The marble edifice comprises four stories including the lone, tall circular hall inside the top, and the lone chamber in the basement.
Aravamudan calls him a stpry  whose life’s work may be summarised by the title of his work World Vedic Heritage: Withoutabox Submit to Film Festivals.
Prince Aurangzeb also mentions this in his letter to Shahjahan. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Was the Taj Mahal originally an ancient Hindu temple?
Those patches indicate the spots where the support for the gold railings were embedded in the floor. In India’s Supreme Court dismissed Oak’s petition to declare that a Hindu king had built the Taj Mahal by saying he had a “bee in his bonnet” about the Taj.
Marvin Miller of New York took a few sstory from the riverside doorway of the Taj.
Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists. The following summaries and conversations are as they appear on “Hindunet”, and I have not corrected the Indian “English” colloqualisms He says this term does not occur in any Moghul court papers or chronicles, even after ShahJahan’s time.
Others assert that a man at hand was ordered to design a mausoleum and his design was approved. Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped.
They may be seen from the river bank. Visitors may notice that the base slab of the centotaph is the marble basement in plain white while its superstructure and the other three centotaphs on the two floors are covered with inlaid creeper designs.
The Yamuna River pictured in It is this earlier Hindu tradition in the Tajmahal which gave the Islamic myth of Shahjahan’s love tear dropping on Maahl tomb on the full moon day of p.n.oai winter eve. Was the Taj Mahal really built for Mumtaz Mahal?
I am not going to give the points but will tell the people to read this book and judge themselves only. Twenty thousand labourers are supposed to have worked for 22 years during Shahjahan’s reign in building the Tajmahal.
Residential accomodation on such a stupendous scale is unthinkable in a mausoleum.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.